In defence of the original CBX Alternator
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 11:57 am
There’s no doubt; the original CBX Z alternator is not brilliant.
It is mechanically complex (that clutch!), not particularly powerful, and will not begin to charge the battery until quite a few RPM above idle ...
But what bothers me most when I ride (main lights always on) is observing the voltmeter dip to unnerving lows, usually below an indicated 11V, every time I slow down or do any city riding.
And yes, the needle will always creep up, well past 12V when I wind the throttle or drop a gear.
All the above make me glance at the voltmeter more often than not, always wondering about the battery and alternator.
With this behaviour how am I to know when I will get a real alternator failure?
As we all know, when this fails, it is time to switch off all non critical electrical loads and head home at the speed of light (no pun intended). Or else …
But is the puny CBX alternator to blame for the low reading of the voltmeter, or could there be another reason for this behaviour?
For example, why do I get an indicated 10V or so, on my stationary bike (engine kill switch to OFF), with ignition & lights on (low beam)?
Surely my brand new, fully charged monster YUASA does not go from a healthy 12V to 10V in 2 seconds flat?
And yet, at least in my bike (UK spec Z), this is what I have been observing every time. Oh, and before anyone shouts foul, the electrical system of the machine is bog standard down to every detail.
Well, there is one way to find out. So I took the Z instrument cluster out of the bike, and connected the voltmeter alone to a quality power supply and multi meter.
First, and as an aside, I found its current consumption to be 105mA at 13.5V. Wow, we are dissipating here 1.25W just to move a tiny needle! A modern LED digital voltmeter I used later on, never exceeded 10mA, or less than 1/10th of the power consumption of the above ☺.
Then I plotted input voltage (X axis), versus indicated (Y axis), covering its entire operating range, at room temperature: The results point to a highly non linear instrument.
However if we look closely and check its indicated error (absolute value) plotted against input voltage as below, we observe that it is surprisingly accurate, at less than 2% around the all important 11.5 to 13.5 voltage range, and very accurate indeed, at around 1%, between 12 and 13 Volts! So it should be adequate for the job, and yet I was getting those silly 10V readings I mentioned earlier.
Trying to get a feel for the power consumption of the bike with various loads, I disconnected the battery, replacing it with a quality, heavy duty HP power supply. I then turned the ignition to ON (engine kill switch to OFF) and incrementally brought in various loads to see what happens. The results are as shown below ..
Load type Total Incremental
Quiescent: 2.5A - Ignition to ‘On’, Engine kill switch to ‘Off’
+ Parking lights On: 4.5A 2.0A
+ Drive lights On: 8.8A 4.3A 60 W high beam on
+ Brake lights On: 11.5A 2.7A
+ Kill switch to On: PS Out of Range
Interestingly, and despite my rock steady 12V power supply, with ignition on and high beam on, the CBX Voltmeter was showing just over10V!!!
To ensure I was not making a mistake anywhere along this line of thought, I temporarily connected a digital voltmeter across the power supply. At the time the CBX voltmeter had dived to ~10V, this was sitting nicely at 12.0V!
This was simply not right and it was time to dive into the CBX’s circuit diagram, where all was revealed! The way the voltmeter is wired at the very ‘end’ of the puny CBX wiring loom, means its less than stellar accuracy is further seriously compromised by the various loads, connectors and switches along the way. This is true in BOTH the positive AND earth paths, as shown in the diagram above.
Encouraged by the more than acceptable, intrinsic accuracy of the voltmeter in the 11.5V to 13.5V range, I removed the positive wire from the instrument and connected it directly to the power supply (aka battery) positive. And presto! With the same previous load, the voltmeter jumped from an indicated 10V to an indicated 12V!
So, where does that leave us? Well, in my case at least, I will proceed to correct this by way of a minor wiring change to the instrument cluster plus a small relay. Equally important, I have worked a way to make this 100% reversible.
Then, with much more realistic voltmeter readings I will begin enjoying the road rather than worrying about low indicated voltages. And if I observe low readings again (heaven forbid), then I will immediately know there is real trouble on the way, and time to switch off the lights and run home.
Summary of the above:
Various electrical loads, e.g. the bike’s headlamp, acting on the less than perfect wiring of the original CBX Z loom result in erroneous, lower voltage readings of the voltmeter, accentuating the effects of the weak CBX alternator.
Best, Aris
It is mechanically complex (that clutch!), not particularly powerful, and will not begin to charge the battery until quite a few RPM above idle ...
But what bothers me most when I ride (main lights always on) is observing the voltmeter dip to unnerving lows, usually below an indicated 11V, every time I slow down or do any city riding.
And yes, the needle will always creep up, well past 12V when I wind the throttle or drop a gear.
All the above make me glance at the voltmeter more often than not, always wondering about the battery and alternator.
With this behaviour how am I to know when I will get a real alternator failure?
As we all know, when this fails, it is time to switch off all non critical electrical loads and head home at the speed of light (no pun intended). Or else …
But is the puny CBX alternator to blame for the low reading of the voltmeter, or could there be another reason for this behaviour?
For example, why do I get an indicated 10V or so, on my stationary bike (engine kill switch to OFF), with ignition & lights on (low beam)?
Surely my brand new, fully charged monster YUASA does not go from a healthy 12V to 10V in 2 seconds flat?
And yet, at least in my bike (UK spec Z), this is what I have been observing every time. Oh, and before anyone shouts foul, the electrical system of the machine is bog standard down to every detail.
Well, there is one way to find out. So I took the Z instrument cluster out of the bike, and connected the voltmeter alone to a quality power supply and multi meter.
First, and as an aside, I found its current consumption to be 105mA at 13.5V. Wow, we are dissipating here 1.25W just to move a tiny needle! A modern LED digital voltmeter I used later on, never exceeded 10mA, or less than 1/10th of the power consumption of the above ☺.
Then I plotted input voltage (X axis), versus indicated (Y axis), covering its entire operating range, at room temperature: The results point to a highly non linear instrument.
However if we look closely and check its indicated error (absolute value) plotted against input voltage as below, we observe that it is surprisingly accurate, at less than 2% around the all important 11.5 to 13.5 voltage range, and very accurate indeed, at around 1%, between 12 and 13 Volts! So it should be adequate for the job, and yet I was getting those silly 10V readings I mentioned earlier.
Trying to get a feel for the power consumption of the bike with various loads, I disconnected the battery, replacing it with a quality, heavy duty HP power supply. I then turned the ignition to ON (engine kill switch to OFF) and incrementally brought in various loads to see what happens. The results are as shown below ..
Load type Total Incremental
Quiescent: 2.5A - Ignition to ‘On’, Engine kill switch to ‘Off’
+ Parking lights On: 4.5A 2.0A
+ Drive lights On: 8.8A 4.3A 60 W high beam on
+ Brake lights On: 11.5A 2.7A
+ Kill switch to On: PS Out of Range
Interestingly, and despite my rock steady 12V power supply, with ignition on and high beam on, the CBX Voltmeter was showing just over10V!!!
To ensure I was not making a mistake anywhere along this line of thought, I temporarily connected a digital voltmeter across the power supply. At the time the CBX voltmeter had dived to ~10V, this was sitting nicely at 12.0V!
This was simply not right and it was time to dive into the CBX’s circuit diagram, where all was revealed! The way the voltmeter is wired at the very ‘end’ of the puny CBX wiring loom, means its less than stellar accuracy is further seriously compromised by the various loads, connectors and switches along the way. This is true in BOTH the positive AND earth paths, as shown in the diagram above.
Encouraged by the more than acceptable, intrinsic accuracy of the voltmeter in the 11.5V to 13.5V range, I removed the positive wire from the instrument and connected it directly to the power supply (aka battery) positive. And presto! With the same previous load, the voltmeter jumped from an indicated 10V to an indicated 12V!
So, where does that leave us? Well, in my case at least, I will proceed to correct this by way of a minor wiring change to the instrument cluster plus a small relay. Equally important, I have worked a way to make this 100% reversible.
Then, with much more realistic voltmeter readings I will begin enjoying the road rather than worrying about low indicated voltages. And if I observe low readings again (heaven forbid), then I will immediately know there is real trouble on the way, and time to switch off the lights and run home.
Summary of the above:
Various electrical loads, e.g. the bike’s headlamp, acting on the less than perfect wiring of the original CBX Z loom result in erroneous, lower voltage readings of the voltmeter, accentuating the effects of the weak CBX alternator.
Best, Aris