Correct 422 piston pins


Post Reply
User avatar
Kool_Biker
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 654
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 5:46 pm
Location: Great Britain
Location: Great Britain

Correct 422 piston pins

Post by Kool_Biker »

In my spares chest, I have two types of piston pins.
External dimensions are identical and both will fit pistons and con-rods.
But their internal diameters are slightly different, and hence their weight; ~9 mm and 44 grams on the left, compared to ~10 mm and 37 grams on the right.
I guess, 7 extra grams of reciprocating weight up there is something, so could you please advise which one of the two types is the correct one for the 79 Z?
P1070343.jpg
Cheers, Aris
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Aris Hadjiaslanis
ICOA # 6309
Berkshire, Windsor

daves79x
ICOA Technical Director
ICOA Technical Director
Posts: 4891
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:05 am
Location: Knox, PA
Location: Knox, PA

Re: Correct 422 piston pins

Post by daves79x »

Aris:
Sorry for taking so long to reply. Here's what I found: All the wristpins I found here were original CBX ones and they all measure 10MM ID and all weigh 38G. I can't find any like your 9MM ones. I'd try to find all the 10MM ones to use. I'll post my rod findings on the other thread.

Dave

User avatar
Kool_Biker
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 654
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 5:46 pm
Location: Great Britain
Location: Great Britain

Re: Correct 422 piston pins

Post by Kool_Biker »

Hmmm, thanks Dave, very interesting.

Looking back at my notes I now realise what's happened; although I ordered the correct wristpins, P/N 13111-422-000 from David Silver Spares in the UK, they sent me P/N 13111-425-000 which according to them, superseded the original P/N.

Although externally dimensionally identical, their 1mm small ID makes them each about 7gm heavier.

In my books, and please correct me if I am wrong:

(a) The two P/N should never be mixed and matched in the same crank; they would compromise the balance of the engine, and
(b) They should be avoided, if possible altogether, as an extra 42 gm (7gm X 6) of avoidable reciprocating weight up there at 9,000 RPM can't be great :?

A good example I think, of how many traps there are out there ...

Aris
Aris Hadjiaslanis
ICOA # 6309
Berkshire, Windsor

User avatar
Don
Amazing Poster
Amazing Poster
Posts: 806
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 3:13 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi, USA
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi, USA

Re: Correct 422 piston pins

Post by Don »

Maybe a machinist could bore 7 grams out of the center of them?

Don

User avatar
Kool_Biker
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 654
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 5:46 pm
Location: Great Britain
Location: Great Britain

Re: Correct 422 piston pins

Post by Kool_Biker »

Been through this Don, would be easy enough and great ...
But, they are toughened :(
Aris
Aris Hadjiaslanis
ICOA # 6309
Berkshire, Windsor

User avatar
bobcat
Power Poster
Power Poster
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:35 pm
Location: Dallas Texas
Location: Dallas Texas

Re: Correct 422 piston pins

Post by bobcat »

when i built my CB900F, i used CBX pistons (900f and cbx share the same bore ,64.5 mm ,but have dramatically different stroke).
i used 4th over CBX pistons, but the wrist pins had a taper bore from each end ,thickest in the center ! its been about 16 years
since i built this thing and i cant remember if i used "pre-superceded X pins or 900F pins . might be worth investigating !

my FIRST entry !thanks NILS for your help !
bobcat
Bob
82 CBX, 81 CBX, CB1100F, 79/82 CB900F (avatar)

User avatar
bobcat
Power Poster
Power Poster
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:35 pm
Location: Dallas Texas
Location: Dallas Texas

Re: Correct 422 piston pins

Post by bobcat »

bobcat wrote:when i built my CB900F, i used CBX pistons (900f and cbx share the same bore ,64.5 mm ,but have dramatically different stroke).
i used 4th over CBX pistons, but the wrist pins had a taper bore from each end ,thickest in the center ! its been about 16 years
since i built this thing and i cant remember if i used "pre-superceded X pins or 900F pins . might be worth investigating !

my FIRST entry !thanks NILS for your help !
bobcat
the best lessons learned are the
"hard way"
Bob
82 CBX, 81 CBX, CB1100F, 79/82 CB900F (avatar)

User avatar
NobleHops
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 3917
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:17 am
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA

Re: Correct 422 piston pins

Post by NobleHops »

Welcome Bob, glad to have you!

N.
Nils Menten
Tucson, Arizona, USA
'82 CBX, among others.

EMS
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 10151
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2003 7:55 am
Location: North East OH, ICOA 3904

Re: Correct 422 piston pins

Post by EMS »

bobcat wrote:when i built my CB900F, i used CBX pistons (900f and cbx share the same bore ,64.5 mm ,but have dramatically different stroke).
bobcat
Welcome, bobcat!

Question: Does the original CB900F piston have a different number of rings than the CBX piston?

User avatar
bobcat
Power Poster
Power Poster
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:35 pm
Location: Dallas Texas
Location: Dallas Texas

Re: Correct 422 piston pins

Post by bobcat »

same number of rings ,but CBX pistons are shorter and lighter than 900f . they are also "domed" where the 900f pistons
are almost flat top !

bobcat
Bob
82 CBX, 81 CBX, CB1100F, 79/82 CB900F (avatar)

Post Reply

Return to “ENGINES: Maintenance, Performance, Parts Sources”