1979 vs Prolink Intakes

Post Reply
barryadam
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:33 am
Location: Mission Viejo, California, USA
Location: Mission Viejo, California, USA

1979 vs Prolink Intakes

Post by barryadam »

I realize the Prolink carb-to-engine boots angle the carbs differently than the 1979 boots do.

Are the air chamber-to-carb boots, the chamber, or the airfilter box different dimensionally between the 1979 and the 1981/82?

My 1979 project hulk was missing everything south of the carbs. I have access to a nice condition Prolink chamber and chamber-to-carb boots, and an airfilter box from an unknown year.
Will it fit the 1979 frame?

My schoolbike engine came with carb-to-engine boots, so I assume they are the angled, Prolink ones. (I can't get to them right away to verify) Will the 1979 frame with the Prolink intake system as above, I assume I'd use those angled boots.

I guess the bottom line is: are all the parts upstream of the carbs dimensionally the same and the difference taken up in the location in the frame? Or is the 1979 and Prolink frame identical for airbox/chamber mounting and position? I assume the engine is mounted in the exact same place/angle in all years' frames.

Jeez, this is harder to describe than I thought.

User avatar
Don
Amazing Poster
Amazing Poster
Posts: 806
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 3:13 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi, USA
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi, USA

Re: 1979 vs Prolink Intakes

Post by Don »

I believe everything behind the carbs on a ProLink is completely different than on an early model - None of it will correctly fit a '79 frame

Don

daves79x
ICOA Technical Director
ICOA Technical Director
Posts: 4891
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:05 am
Location: Knox, PA
Location: Knox, PA

Re: 1979 vs Prolink Intakes

Post by daves79x »

You need to use the Pro-Link chamber and it will bolt right up to the '79 frame, but you'll need the '79 air box (filter box) if you want the wiring mount to match the '79. If you don't care about the wiring being mounted in holders, then the entire air box system from the Pro-Link will go in a '79 frame. I have both here and can compare exactly if you want, but that is my recollection.

Dave

barryadam
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:33 am
Location: Mission Viejo, California, USA
Location: Mission Viejo, California, USA

Re: 1979 vs Prolink Intakes

Post by barryadam »

Dave & Don,

Thanks guys. The Prolink chamber looks really fresh, so that's going to work for me. The air filter box has the wiring bracket, so I'm guessing it's from a 1979.
I have a 1979 chamber, too, but it looks like it was in a swamp for decades. For some reason, I disassembled it when I first got it to try and get the scum cleaned out. The chamber sides would take a bit of work and probably never look as fresh as the textured ones on the Prolink box.

Barry

User avatar
NobleHops
ICOA Member
ICOA Member
Posts: 3917
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:17 am
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA

Re: 1979 vs Prolink Intakes

Post by NobleHops »

barryadam wrote:Dave & Don,

Thanks guys. The Prolink chamber looks really fresh, so that's going to work for me. The air filter box has the wiring bracket, so I'm guessing it's from a 1979.
I have a 1979 chamber, too, but it looks like it was in a swamp for decades. For some reason, I disassembled it when I first got it to try and get the scum cleaned out. The chamber sides would take a bit of work and probably never look as fresh as the textured ones on the Prolink box.

Barry
Barry, if you want to stick with the original setup, mine were repainted with SEM flexible bumper coating, although I now think that the SEM satin trim paint would have been a better choice. It comes in rattlecans and is very easy to work with. I use it all over the place.

Before:

Image


After (with some fisheyes that I resanded and touched-up):

Image

Image

and those are raindrops in this next pic:

Image



The other approach to restoring the old one is to clean the bejesus out of it with something like 409 and then hit it with the heat gun. I believe that Spencer did this and had good results, but it is possible to do catastrophic damage this way too.

N.
Nils Menten
Tucson, Arizona, USA
'82 CBX, among others.

User avatar
Don
Amazing Poster
Amazing Poster
Posts: 806
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 3:13 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi, USA
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi, USA

Re: 1979 vs Prolink Intakes

Post by Don »

Also . . . . the badly faded ones can be wetsanded to look like new - No painting required

Begin with #600 wet or dry paper and work your way up through 1000, 1500 and 2000 grit, then wax the plastic and it will look like new

Don

Post Reply

Return to “CARBS: Cleaning, Rebuilding, Swaps, Aftermarket, Tuning, Syncing, and More”