So I'm somewhere in the middle of an overbore, and valve job. I am preparing to farm out the overbore and hone. I just received a set of brand new 1st over (.025?) pistons from Honda. The original pistons measured as follows:
ORIGINALS
2.5383
2.5384
2.5383
2.5385
2.5385
2.5385
When I measured the new ones I got:
NEW ("25")
2.5480 (all)
Increase of .010 diameter from original
I expected 2.538 + .025 = 2.563
What gives?
Is this right? Am I missing something?
/r
Brad
Overbore; Ensuring the right stuff
- cbx6ss
- ICOA Member
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
-
- ICOA Member
- Posts: 10151
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2003 7:55 am
- Location: North East OH, ICOA 3904
I am a little confused by all these numbers, especially as you mix metric and standard measurements. The Honda CBX is a metric bike. The piston oversizes were usually identified by mm oversize 0.25mm, 0.5mm,0.75mm and 1mm. I don't know where you have the 0.025 (inch?) oversize dimension from.
Your old pistons measure 2.535 inches = 64.46mm
The new ones are 2.548 inches = 64.72mm
Difference = +0.26mm = 1st over
Your old pistons measure 2.535 inches = 64.46mm
The new ones are 2.548 inches = 64.72mm
Difference = +0.26mm = 1st over
- cbx6ss
- ICOA Member
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Got it! I went back to the parts web site to check and sure enough they offer:
.25
.50
.75
1.00
Maybe if the U.S. had gone metric (in the 70's?) like we were supposed to, that would be one less thing confusing me today. Instead we have both measures on everything today.
Thank you all!
Regards,
Brad
-----Original Message-----
From: The Becks [mailto:T_CBECK@Charleston.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:38 PM
To: Brad Eyre
Subject: Re: Overbore continued...
0.25mm, or about .01 inches.
Tony Beck
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cbx@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-cbx@ucdavis.edu] On Behalf Of XCBMW@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:20 PM
To: eyrepb@comcast.net; cbx@ucdavis.edu
Subject: Re: Overbore continued...
In a message dated 9/10/08 7:54:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, eyrepb@comcast.net writes:
<<I>>
Sounds like the 2.538 is inches and the overbore is .25mm
Paul
NJ
.25
.50
.75
1.00
Maybe if the U.S. had gone metric (in the 70's?) like we were supposed to, that would be one less thing confusing me today. Instead we have both measures on everything today.
Thank you all!
Regards,
Brad
-----Original Message-----
From: The Becks [mailto:T_CBECK@Charleston.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:38 PM
To: Brad Eyre
Subject: Re: Overbore continued...
0.25mm, or about .01 inches.
Tony Beck
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cbx@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-cbx@ucdavis.edu] On Behalf Of XCBMW@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:20 PM
To: eyrepb@comcast.net; cbx@ucdavis.edu
Subject: Re: Overbore continued...
In a message dated 9/10/08 7:54:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, eyrepb@comcast.net writes:
<<I>>
Sounds like the 2.538 is inches and the overbore is .25mm
Paul
NJ
-
- ICOA Member
- Posts: 10151
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2003 7:55 am
- Location: North East OH, ICOA 3904
-
- ICOA Rally Director
- Posts: 2313
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:16 pm
- Location: Lawrencburg, IN
- Location: Lawrenceburg, Indiana
- alimey4u2
- ICOA Web Video Director
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:03 pm
- Location: Uphill, WsM, United Kingdom